>>>"Bruce is almost guaranteed to take this last and do his polar-inversion-semantic-nullification-field generation trick on it"
You mean even YOU can see that what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, and YOU need to apply your own statement to YOUR biased viewpoint???<<<
Bruce, While "sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander" Is a tried and sometimes true cliche, you over use it and use it without thought to the context. Most people have eyes enough to see that while Obama and McCain both have weaknesses as candidates, there are very few places where those weaknesses precisely overlap. Yet you constantly take a criticism of "McCain", do a "search and replace" for "Obama" and pretend that you have said something thoughtful.
Do you actually apply any intellectual effort of your own into these debates? Do you ever bother to think about what is said? If you do the effort does not show. Why don't you express some of your own opinions?