MBS George, you said-'Any party has to change as it grows and I believe that the good bits will stay and the not so good bits will be phased out. I was purely interested in housing, benefit, childcare and employment. None of the other parties had anything covering these and still don't."


If what you wrote is true, why is the language of the BNP so focused on the not so good bits? If you feel so misunderstood, and resentful of a racist tag because you were only interested in housing, benefit, etc, why did you not get involved with a party that may not have been adequately covering your concerns....but does not come with the baggage of the BNP? Doesn't make much sense to me..then again, the BNP makes no sense to me whatsoever, and whatever they may speak of as a genuine legitimate concern (which I personally doubt), is masked with a pervasive racist tone. I'm sorry-call this an attack if you want to, but joining up with this particular party, and then claiming oh its only because....but its not because of....is quite frankly, weak, when you have as Emma stated, an organization-"wholly opposed to any form of racial integration between British and non-European peoples" and believes in restoring "the overwhelmingly white make up of the British population that existed in Britain prior to 1948".