Keith, you carring on like this is absurd.

We already busted you for that 8.5% nonsense because your figures were bogus - they were based on gay men being 1-2% of populations, which was show to be utterly silly.

So - and it was still imperfect - 4% HIV prevalence was accepted apparently for the sake of argument.

But the point was not about gay/straight better/worse more/less STI's, it was about the fact that Ake and GfS were wrong to assert - as they did - that homosexual practice was in and of itself causative of the HIV prevalence.

The way to disprove that assertion is to point out the heterosexual STI prevalence - spread by the same risky behaviours as evidence that practice is not solely responsible for the outcome.

I was angry, I had a tongue in cheek. I stand by my comments totally.

You are a nasty bigotted lying piece of work.

And now everyone knows it.