ichMael, your postings about Obama would carry more weight and seem a hell of a lot more credible if you didn't allow your extreme personal loathing of him to be quite so obvious. ;-) Just a kindly tip from a fellow debater.

lol. I don't debate here, Little Hawk. This is a place where dissent is ridiculed and shouted down. I go offsite to make my points for the knuckleheads here. But thanks for the advice. I'll consider changing my ways and, who knows maybe I can, like, win a popularity contest here or something.

But back to the subject at hand.

Gore's sanity really is up for question. He tried the Copenhagen scam with the carbon emissions limits and all that. That would have killed no telling how many millions in Africa with the restrictions placed on their growth. They wouldn't have been able to upgrade to clean housing, middle class jobs created by manufacturing and such. The Africans saw through the scam at the last minute, when the final draft was released with the last-minute genocide clauses slipped in, and they walked out.

So would a sane man try to kill millions of Africans in that way? Prickly question. If you're a Nietzschean superman who believes he owes it to the species to cull the weak, then your genocidal actions are perfectly sane (to you). Gore views himself as a superman. Unfortunately, no jury except a jury of neo-nazis would find Gore innocent of attempted genocide. He's as nutty as a praline.