There is no ad hominem attack. I thought one person had quoted the ad and then said I never mentioned Goswami since then. That's an ad hominem attack. It's saying that I am conceding that Goswami is wrong not for what he says about physics but because of some silly ad. But one person quoted the ad for whatever reasons of his own which he didn't elucidate and which I diden't comment on because I didn't know his motivation. But someone else implied I was conceding that Goswami is not a worthwhile source because of the ad which I was not doing because regardless of the ad, he's still a qualified physicist.

So there was no fucking ad homimen--just get off it. thanks.