"From: Peter T. Date: 15-Oct-00 - 01:49 PM (a) The idea that Paul McCartney needs to write for the money is about the funniest thing I have heard in a long time. The man practically owns counties in Britain. I wish he had't written all the dreck he has, but that he is doing it for the money is absurd. "

Love for money has no limits. A rich person wants often more and more and more and ..., it sometimes becomes a kind of drug. I didnt say that he NEEDS to write for money, but I get a feeling thats why he is doing it anyway. Didnt he have an economical dispute with the group he song Mull of Kentire with, The Wings, a long time ago ? I read somewhere many years ago that The Wings (or somebody else) wanted a percent of the future incomes from an album or some songs they had made with McCartney, but Paul McCartney wanted to pay them out with a one-time-amount. And the co-operation collapsed. Is this more or less correct ?