Of course you would, Doug. But once again, that is just because it is not flattering to your side, or more correctly, it is much more beneficial to the Democratic side. But seeing as how you have taken upon yourself to act like Dubya, I believe I will pin you down. Or will you be like Dubya and just not answer? The question is simple. What part of the the facts quoted in the article do you find to be of a specious, fallacious or opinionated nature? Do you deny the effect of the legislation vetoed? Did the author misquote or untruthfully tell any of the facts? I would love to hear your response. We might as well debate it for the good citizens of the Village of Mudcat.
duplicate posting deleted
-el joeclone -