"That sounds like a gauntlet being thrown down... Care to eleborate? "

I didn't mean it that way, particularly, and I'm sorry if it seemed a contentious statement.

My point was only that, just as evolution remains, technically, a "theory" capable of being falsified by future evidence, so the existence of an entity we'd call "God" cannot be determined to be true or false based on the evidence we have.

However _unlikely_ the existence of such a being might be, it's not _impossible_, and therefore any absolute stance for or against is necessarily just opinion. "I (don't) believe there's a God, but I might be wrong" is considerably different to "there is a/no God".

Does that clear things up at all?