Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj



User Name Thread Name Subject Posted
GUEST,Brendan BS: Young Earth Creationism Eureka--Contd... (317* d) RE: BS: YEC Eureka--Contd... 03 May 12

I am not attempting to be contentious here-I simply want to understand. It is my understanding that there is more than enough evidence to demonstrate the reality of evolution. If that is the case why would I be wrong to describe evolution as an aspect of the physical world established by empirical observation? (Or would I be wrong? As you will have gathered I am not a scientist!). Is the answer that I am not observing a thing but a process and evolution is a hypothesis developed to explain this process?

Post to this Thread -

Back to the Main Forum Page

By clicking on the User Name, you will requery the forum for that user. You will see everything that he or she has posted with that Mudcat name.

By clicking on the Thread Name, you will be sent to the Forum on that thread as if you selected it from the main Mudcat Forum page.
   * Click on the linked number with * to view the thread split into pages (click "d" for chronologically descending).

By clicking on the Subject, you will also go to the thread as if you selected it from the original Forum page, but also go directly to that particular message.

By clicking on the Date (Posted), you will dig out every message posted that day.

Try it all, you will see.