But we have no evidence he did, Eliza, other than what the police are saying and they are NOT going to prosecute him. Why? IF he has been doing such things, he SHOULD be prosecuted, surely?   I find it extraordinary that he would not be.

Of course, no-one can tell who is sitting at a computer at any given time.

NEVER let anyone you know, or don't know, use YOUR computer by the way, because you just don't know...

This morning, we have Vanessa Feltz (don't even get me started on Vanessa) saying Rolf, whilst lying on a bed with her during an interview (????) got the hem of her dress in her hand and started to roll her kaftan up, until his hand reached her thigh, where he tried to get inside her underwear. He did this very fast, whilst she was interviewing him, whilst the cameras were rolling, whilst the TV crew were all around the bed, whilst his wife was watching. She cut to an advert and whispered in his ear, "what the fuck do you think you're doing?", apparently. She said he merely smiled.

So far, no footage of this incident is 'out there', but perhaps it may turn up shortly, for like the other presenter in Oz, who said he abused *her* during a TV interview, watched by a friend of hers who was in the studio at the time, and, I presume, the entire camera crew and production team, no-one would throw away or destroy that kind of evidence, would they?

Apparently, she was warned by the make-up girls to watch out for him, as he was known to have wandering hands....but no-one thought interviewing such a man on a bed, lying down close to a presenter was a silly idea, despite so many people apparently knowing all about him, nor did they use that opportunity to 'catch him' and finally, pardon the pun, put to bed, all the whispers/rumours that had been rife, everywhere, so they could protect other women from him, forever.

If the footage appears, and shows this incident very clearly, then yes, I will believe he did this. Different TV cameras are trained on the main interview and guests from different angles, as far I am aware, so hopefully, this will soon come to light and we can all be 100% certain about everything. Odd that Vanessa has only now come out with this story though...

I'd have thought it would have broken days back and that, indeed, she would have put herself forward as a witness for the trial. But I guess that's my brain doing that 'always question everything!' thing it tends to do. I should merely just 'accept' everything I'm told and simply get on with my life...

I will also believe he may have abused a 7 year old, in full view of a queue of people, twice over, in a community centre in Portsmouth IF someone can find me a link to him EVER having BEEN there in the first place...

>>>"....Another woman claimed Mr Harris touched her intimately when she was seven or eight after she queued to get his autograph at a community centre near Portsmouth in 1969.

No confirmation could be found that Mr Harris had been there, despite searches of local newspaper archives, council records and letter drops appealing for witnesses.

This included looking at copies of the Portsmouth News between January 1967 and May 1974...."<<<