Right, back in 'membership' name now.

Sorry, above post came out a bit muddled...but you will get the gist.



MtheGM, I do not have *specific* instances, as I don't copy other people's posts, but you have, in the past, gone on and on about the way I write, what I write about, how I write etc..and even when you've said kind things, you follow it up with criticism about something else. I've never commented on how you, or anyone else writes, ever. Nor will I ever do so.   I write in a way which is simply natural to me, that's all and would appreciate it if I were just left alone to be me. I do not think you're a bad person, quite the opposite, in fact...but I just write the way I do, as it's natural for me to do so. I don't care about the rules or expectations of others.....


CS, how DARE you say such a thing. I'm actually one of the few folks in here who is daring to stand up for someone whom I believe has been treated appallingly.

Please, CS, SHOW me the 'evidence' that Rolf was at the community centre in Portsmouth. He was said to have just finished singing songs, so there'd have been an audience. Yet there is nothing, not a newspaper story (and they've search for years either side of the date given too), not a local person who recalls this 'gig', nothing whatsoever to place Rolf Harris in that hall. He was a HUGE star back then and without any doubt whatsoever this story WOULD have been reported on.

Tonya Lee lied. She admitted to this in Court.

I, unlike so many others, am NOT going on what the journalists say, but on what the defence said, searching out these things and finding they spoke the truth.

The local Portsmouth paper, 'The News' who had their archives searched for info on Rolf's gig, nothing being found, have told me they refuse to look deeper for any evidence, despite me asking them to, despite me asking them why they'd believe such a story from anyone, when they KNOW that Rolf wasn't even THERE.

So, you're telling me that this is RIGHT, CS?

If this were happening to your son, would you not be jumping up and down in rage?

The Cambridge witness was 5 years out in her dates. FACT
She got the programme title totally wrong. FACT
There was no-one who saw her alleged attack happen. FACT

Tonya Lee made $60,000 from selling her story. (links above) FACT
She lied to the police about this. FACT
Her boyfriend stated she made it all up to pay off her debts. FACT
She WAS in debt at this time. FACT

Bindi's ex-friend said Rolf started to sexually abuse her on holiday, yet wrote in her diary that this holiday had been 'great'. FACT

She asked Rolf Harris for £25,000 donation for a bird sanctuary AFTER their affair had ended, despite stating she was terrified of him and had been trapped in this relationship due to her terror and horror. FACT!

LOOK AT THE LINKS I'VE PUT UP.....

ESPECIALLY look at THIS!




If you don't believe me, go and look on Google, this was all stated in the trial and Bindi's ex-friend admitted to it all, stating that she approached Rolf for money as he'd told her he would always help her if she needed help. FACT.


You would NOT go NEAR someone who had been sexually abusing you for 10 YEARS ever, EVER again, would you, had you managed to 'escape' their clutches?   

Oh..and this....

I got the story about plumber wrong. He apparently was doing work in Rolf's previous home whilst Rolf was living there. He then waited over 40 years before going to the police about his allegations of child porn being under the floorboards. The police found nothing.

Again though, if YOU had gone to the trouble of hiding bad stuff under your floorboards, would you let your plumber, or anyone else, ever pull those floorboards up?

And, if you'd kept such stuff, to look at from time to time, or to add to, over the years, you'd have to continually take your floorboard up to access them, either making some kind of 'handle' for easy opening, or digging away with a screwdriver each time, in which case, yet again, the police would have noticed something...

AND, if they had this story, on TOP of their 'child porn on his computer' story, then WHY did the Crown Prosecution Service NOT prosecute him, because in my book, child porn is not only illegal, but horrific, and for any legal department to turn its head away from prosecuting those who create a market for it, makes no sense and is shockingly out of order, isn't it?

Give me answers to my questions, evidence..and hey, I'll be as quiet as a mouse..but at present, to me, this all stinks to high heaven and far beyond...