sj | ||
|
User Name | Thread Name | Subject | Posted |
GUEST,Steve Shaw, seeing some squirming | WWI, was No-Man's Land (816* d) | RE: WWI, was No-Man's Land | 04 Dec 14 |
Heheh. So the thread devolves into what makes a proper historian now. Lessee: you can't be a historian if you (a) demur even slightly apropos of Haig's exceptionally fine leadership; (b) disagree in absolutely any other way whatsoever in any regard whatsoever with K and T's take on events. Am I warm? Any more strictures to add? |