Guest was being rather kind to you, Keith, when he referred to your blatant misrepresentation. Big porkie would have been more like it. The really stupid thing is that you didn't have to do it. The accurate quote would have been just as supportive for you but, lazily, you sort of half-remembered it, faultily as it turned out, churned it out and failed to credit us with the intelligence to notice. A sloppy approach that would have disgraced any of your vaunted historians. Credibility totally shattered. So what are we to believe from you from now on, Keith?
By the way, any thoughts yet on the views of your favoured correspondent on Israel?