User Name |
Thread Name |
Subject |
Posted |
GUEST,correctly spelled Lamarckian (but still not
|
BS: Well, I'm not a scientist...
(237* d)
|
RE: BS: Well, I'm not a scientist...
|
19 Dec 14
|
@Bill D I think mine was the only post that mentioned Lamarck (took me ages to find it 'cos I missed the 'c' out). It was the one-liner "Epigenetic changes ?" I wondered when someone would pick up on someone else's recent "inheritance of acquired characterists". I quite like to bring it up in these discussions because although the Lamarck was wrong in the wider sense I still remember the outright mockery with which my paleontology professor recounted his (Lamarck's) theory. I wonder just how much sooner epigentic changes would have been recognised at a molecular level if researches had risked mockery and dared to do some experiments earlier. With people like Pete around one has to be careful to stick to a measured scientific approach.
|