Just pointing and laughing, that's all.

I assume "the historians" have a secret initiation etc. Tell you what Keith, your blind faith in a title that anyone can use, and often do, is touching. Many "historians" are not quite as independent as you think. Their publishers want controversy, their readers want to take comfort in what they read and The Daily M*il want to serialise it.

At their last meeting, they presumably passed a motion to agree with Keith.

I think I'll pop and pass a motion myself.





That's better. I concur.