Sorry - premature ejaculation Meant to add this MUSIC I have no objection to sharing material and ideas on the internet Jack - why on earth are you suggesting I have? It's opened up a whole new world for all of us and made the impossible possible - I'm even able to talk to you fellers without moving away from home The thing I find disturbing abut the net is its inclination towards alienation - it is replacing personal contact in many cases I have become tired, even a little frightened of the growing tendency of having to stare at the top of people's heads in the street when I have to scurry out of the way of their way along the pavements - somewhat reminiscent of 'Invasion of the Bodysnatchers' with people clutching their giant pods. As an addition to communication, technology is a godsend, as a replacement for personal contact - I fear it greatly For me, technology will never beat the act of sitting in a room full of people listening to them sing to each other - not in my lifetime, I hope "who decides whether or not it is in the traditional style? " Based on what we have already, it should be a formality Dave - if other genres don't have a problem, why should we? God knows, we have a century or so of research and recordings to base our ideas on. The fact that it is possible to go into many folk clubs now and not hear anything resembling a folk song should ring enough alarm bells - couple taht with some of the arguments here....... "We could call them the Folk Poli...." That's one of the most despicably nasty terms to have surfaced in the revival and is usually flung about by people demanding that we should stop thinking about folk song and go with the flow - a sort of Folk SS Jim Carroll
|