The message here appears to be that peadophelia, rape and sexual persecution isn't important if it is carried out by Tories Tories have a history of their politicians being involved not just in harassment, but serious sex crimes (including possibly torture and murder) - their leadership has a history of hiding and destroying evidence (even the present Prime Minister has admitted that possibility - that's how possible it is) And the Labour party have a "major problemĀ£ because forty women have complained that Corbyn has "not done enough" to stop sexual harassment in Parliament -!!!!! Theresa May has consistently supported sex pests until their behaviour has become impossible to excuse In a way, she has opted out of taking action by suggesting teh victims go to the police Often the harassment does not reach the level of illegality - you cannot be prosecuted for offering promotion for sex - she stood by Damien Green when he did exactly that Such people should not hold high office (take your pick on whether that means those who persecute or thoe who defend the persecutor) If a woman is sexually assaulted or raped the chances of bringing her attacked to justice are minuscule - that's why only a small percentage of women report sexual attacks Sexual persecution in Parliament should be automatic grounds for dismissal - not passing the problem on to someone else. And Keith continues to defend the countries most prominent paedofile even though the present Prime Minister has suggested that his crimes were possibly covered up and even though the evedence against him was "lost" by another Government minister, who was a known paedophile himself Don'cha love the Tory sense of justice? "It was all a hoax." (unlinked) CREDIBLE "HEATH A PAEDO" "SEVEN CREDIBLE ALLEGED VICTIMS " BOYS AS YOUNG AS TEN Not according to the police enquiry last year Keith, but maybe they didn't know him as well as you do!! Jim Carroll
|