If you think the law is wrong, and will harm people, you break it, and take the consequences. That was Gandhi's rule. It makes sense to me. I note that in the case of immigration "sanctuary" you cite, Bruce, it's a case of the federal government against the state government - in the case of gun laws it's the state versus the local county. I'd have thought in your federal system that makes rather a difference, "county rights" rather than "states rights". How did the county go about ensuring it had public support for defying the state?
|