"I suppose it's a waste of my time asking you how you feel about Britain selling weapons to terrorist states and mass murderers (especially as you support many of our customers in their political aims"

and you wonder why I treat you like a fool!
You have been pointed to the possible motivation of the source Iains - you choose to ignore tha.

I could not care motivates an author, I am only interested in the data presented. I suggest you adopt the same approach. It would save you much of your mindless frothing. As far as I am aware the court decision on the Sorus donation has yet to be decided. Does Sorus donate anything without a political motive?

Amnesty UK accepted a grant of £842,000 (being part of a larger four year award) from the Department for International Development (DFID) This is just one example from the source you disparage. Do you deny it?
I will even make it easy for you and give the audited source.
https://www.amnesty.org/download/documents/32000/fin400072011en.pdf      page 19

Not so squeaky clean and innocent after all. I wonder what strings come attached?


Maybe after your 10 reincarnation you might realise your view of the world is simplistic twaddle, and black merges with white into shades of grey. You are hardly going to get these facts plastered all over the guardian now are you? Would you like me to illustrate a few other points made in those articles that you are so convinced must be fake?