Dear Thief,

"I wanted to ask where the "bipartisanship" was that we were promised?"

That appeal came from the commucRATs, in their jargon, it means capitulating to their socialist agenda. I detest and reject it. They can put it where the sun......

When you see two opposing forces, one favoring (the evil, mean spirited, right wing extremist conservatives) and one seeking the destruction of the Constitution (the organized labor/crime/governmentalist commucRATs), how can there be "bi-partisanship"?

"So far, what I've seen is very far-right cabinet appointments, and very far-right actions (e.g. overturning the abortion thing, the roads-in-the-woods thing, etc.), and NO change in either rhetoric or numbers on his tax-cut"

That would be a testimony to his integrity, that's what he ran on.

It's only "far-right" to the LSC "far-left"

"I suppose by "bipartisanship" Bush means that if the Democrats don't fall into line, they aren't "team players"?

That would be a logical assumption.

"Or am I just missing something really obvious? (Like he's a filthy liar?)"

Yes you are missing something obvious, except it's that Clinton Tom De Ash Hole, Garp D!khe@d and the other democRATs are the filty liars.

(See; Clinton fined for perjury and loses right to practice law for 5 years) The democrat caucus defended him to a man (and that includes Maxie and Sheila)

He should and may be indicted for bribery in the Rich pardon case.

He should be indicted for grand theft larceny for ripping off the White House and not cataloging unknown quantities of opulent gifts from foreign countries while in the Oval Office.

You wouldn't know an honest man if he was slapping the cuffs on you.

love,

mav