Oh really? Hain decides that he knows better than 3 senior judges who deal with the law day in, day out, and you applaud him for willy-nilly overturning the rule of said law (or the interpretation of it, at least). I, for one, cannot see any justification for Hain's declaration of "in the public interest". Except his own self-interest. What difference does it make to me, you, or anyone else that a name is now public? It doesn't help any inquiry into Green's ALLEGED misdeeds, does it? And then there's that - {Green} has plumbed the depths, and... etc. Says who? Says you? I remember your name from other threads. I am left of centre in my politics. But you, sunshine, are a socialist bigot. SPG (what an unfortunate set of initials) is a shifty piece of work at best. As far as I can see. But, me? I'll wait for the law to decide. Except that doesn't suit your agenda, does it? There is no evidence in the public domain, yet oh so quick to rush to judgement & to condemn, aren't you? No evidence, but he's a Tory, he's a Sir, he's got some dodgy looking stuff in his history, so he must be fucking guilty, eh? Nasty little man you are...
|