Well Mark D'Arcy's piece contains a lot of surmise and very little substance. To take a couple of things: rules are rules, rules don't "suggest." And at this moment there is no suggestion that Green faces the prospect of a trial, so references to his chances of getting a "fair trial " being compromised are entirely specious. Laughable, actually. "You can't say anything about me because, well, you never know, at some point in the future somebody might put me on trial and it won't be fair." Hilarious. Even more so when you consider that the only thing that happened is that somebody gave his name away. Had Hain not existed, we'll all have known who this bad boy was by now, and quite right too. Now tell me what you think about the way he treats his employees. That would make a refreshing change.

Ps. Any idea what a " superlawyer" is? :-)