"'It's ok for an extremely wealthy man to terrorise his staff and sexually harass women"
If you are not arguing this, what exactly are you saying ?
This feller has been allowed to buy an injunction silencing the media - you refuse to respond to that
Articles like that in the Independent have discussed in detail why this is damaging to press freedom and brings the law into disrepute - you refuse to respond to that
Pater Hain used a privilege granted to him by his position - you abuse him for doing so
You say "e'll see" whether he is disciplined for it - the rest of us say "we'll see if Green the Groper is punished for his behaviour.
You are attacking hai for telling us what wee need to know - that a billionair shopkeeper has been acused of abusing, groping and bullying his staff
Why is it cowardly to tell us who he is - would you defend the rest of us if we were named as "the accused" - 'course you wouldn't
If you are not defending Green you are defending a law that protects all privileged people
Quoting one of the most extreme of Thatcher's thugs changes nothing

Now - what are these lies you say I have told (not just this opinion I offered here - you suggest I am a serial liar) - nor do I sliur - I leave that to serial childish insulters
I don't expect either an apology or a withdrawal - I never do from some people, but don't do it again or you will be sent to bed without any tea
Jim Carroll