Care to point out the spseudo science in anything I have stated. Precession is a fact The numbers of precession incorporated in world wide myth is a fact Impacts are a fact That ancient civilisations were obsessed by planetary motion is a fact. That these numbers were repeated in architecture such as Angkor Wat is a fact. As I said before this level of detail is not needed to establish crop cycles and the 12 houses of the Zodiac merely make a convenient peg to remember significant numbers. Simply an aide-memoir,e no more, no less Surely the question should be: Why did they think these larger numbers so important? I think we are a little complacent considering our dearth of knowledge of our past, and our certainty that myth does not hide another reality . I think I am well qualified to distinguish between fairy tales, theories and established fact, and between peer reviewed articles in the scientific journals and the gutter press.
|