In particular, it would be silly to describe Harker as 'attempting to destroy' Motherwell. I have read Harkers' book, including what he says about Motherwell, so such a remark would tend to confirm me in a suspicion that the poster simply had not read (and/or understood) Harker's book. Nobody is denying that Harker's book has its flaws, but there seems to be little point in trying to hold a rational discussion about it unless one is prepared to get to grips with what it does and does not set out to do.