Sorry, Helen, but as Steve said, we HAVE read a lot of your posts and links and, at least in my case, many others for over 60 years. I am *prepared* to read or listen to ANY clear exposition of test(s) and data that follows logical reason and scientific procedure.
   The problem is, people who are convinced... or almost convinced.. that paranormal abilities really do exist want to suggest that 'reports' and 'anecdotes' in sufficient quantities suffice. Yes, such anecdotes can warrant exploration, but in every case there are equally good reasons to suspect alternate causation.
   There are entire categories of logical flaws to help explain why it is so easy & tempting to give credence to many studies and beliefs, but takes a lot of typing to lay them out.
   If YOU are willing to delve into MY list of sources, try this one to begin... https://arachnoid.com/opinion/religion.html and note in the headers at the top, links to a discussion of the scientific method and other items. (Religion is simply the most common belief that pervades human concerns.)

I quite understand why people seem to see various experiences and stories that help them cope with this thing called 'existence', but after 60+ years of formal & informal study, discussion and debate, I find that in certain areas, I don't NEED answers. Your mileage may vary.