bullshit, I have a right to anonymity as we are not offered protection. Jack Campin is allowed to post a flaming and trolling post about another forum over a decade ago, that is totally irrelevant, and bears no relationship to the original post the post is here"Something that has just occurred to me.

We do not all use our actual names as our mudcat handles but we may know other people's real names. quote

When we respond to someone on a thread, should we always reply to them by their handle and respect that they may have a reason for their anonymity? Personally I do not mind if people refer to me as Steve or SPB (my initials) or even Co-operator (my profession/ideology), but it could lead to some confusion when other Steves who hold similar views to me are posting in the same thread."

everything was quiet I have been using my moniker and then Campin posts a trolling thread, talk about stirring the shit , his post is an excuse to have a go at me mentioning another forum from over a decade ago,
the post of cooperator[ i know him very well but out of respect do not use his name].

"Something that has just occurred to me.

We do not all use our actual names as our mudcat handles but we may know other people's real names. quote

When we respond to someone on a thread, should we always reply to them by their handle and respect that they may have a reason for their anonymity? Personally I do not mind if people refer to me as Steve or SPB (my initials) or even Co-operator (my profession/ideology), but it could lead to some confusion when other Steves who hold similar views to me are posting in the same thread."
there is no other Sandman on this forum, refer to me as Sandman.