Oh, you're charming, Claymore. I didn't even insult you. Oh, and I'm female. Yes, as you speculate, I did take Dave's dates, but that hardly matters. Even given later dates, the terms Anglo-Saxon and the culture they imply to us was non-existent at the time. However, I understand from your clarification that the theories of somewhat confused groups are being encouraged by this evidence, and it's they that use the term Anglo-Saxon and not you. This is rather relieving - despite your apparent tendency to jump on my back for being curious, you seemed smarter than that. Apologies for misunderstanding you. I will, as you have kindly provided links, take a look at the articles you mention. I'm out of the country, many news stories escape my notice.

Greg F, although you seem loathe to share your research, I think you should perhaps take a moment and review the post of Troll - I don't think he was criticising your facts or your research, he just wanted you to share it, for those of us who haven't necessarily got time to research it, but are curious, as Claymore has (whether you agree with him or not.) If you're not willing to do so, I understand, but I don't think you need to be so defensive :)

Now, is it so hard to be nice?

-J