Yes, we are related. However, in the interests of clarity, his remarks concerning me do constitute flaming. My commenst about him are perceptive observations of his multiple defects, defficiences and lack of good (or any sense). I rarely bother as I see no need to belabor the obvious.
I think the court case was in 1868 but can't find it right now. Supreme Court decision or not, (as decisions can be reversed), I don't see the consistency in the libertarian position. Not that it's required but if you proclaim (almost demand) a high degree of personnal responsibility on the one hand, then excuse same on the other under the banner of profits, it throws a different light on the ethics and motives of the ideology.
Thanks for the post. Wonder in DHMO was/is linked to things like the acid rain damage to things like the damage to US and Canadian forests and to the damage to the places like Venice?
My best to Freddy and Angie. Tell Mr Feebish, to "Suck it up, cupcake". Hope all the other Yous are doing "well".