sj | ||
|
User Name | Thread Name | Subject | Posted |
GUEST,Lyle | Folk Alliance vs. NAACP (155* d) | RE: Folk Alliance vs. NAACP | 15 Aug 01 |
I'm bothered by a lot of things in this action, but one thing more than most. It would appear that the $300,000 loss for FA is set in stone. Could ANYONE point out why that is so?? I have never seen a "contract" that couldn't be contested in court. Period. And in this case, it seems there is sufficient justification to contest and win. So why is FA using this as an argument?? |