Which Guest/Teribus is which?

Subject: RE: BS: Mudcat Presidential Nominations
From: GUEST
Date: 03 Feb 03 - 03:24 PM

McGrath of Harlow to head the department of blundering senility.

Subject: RE: How to End Racism
From: GUEST
Date: 02 Feb 03 - 09:35 PM

The ancient Romans were devoid of racism. A black man (moor, at any rate) was once emperor (briefly). That squelches that argument. Marco Polo reported that the Chinese weren't racist as long as you adopted their language and culture.

Subject: RE: BS: Mandela on Bush
From: Teribus
Date: 03 Feb 03 - 05:36 AM

I am amazed at the number posting on this topic and to associated threads, who continually refer to America's arrogance with regard to the United Nations over the current Iraq crisis. Many of the same people also refer to America's "unilateralist" actions.

Why, some may ask am I amazed? - Simple

Subject: RE: Celtic Music Dave Bulmer (4)
From: GUEST
Date: 14 Jan 03 - 08:06 PM

Interesting link on Bulmer/Sharpley on uk.music.folk.

Subject: RE: BS: Did the FBI bomb the WTC in '93?
From: GUEST
Date: 31 Jan 03 - 01:04 PM

It's always interesting to see the kooks jump in FAST with their attempts at spin-control, but they never address the ISSUES. Our FBI did the bombing of the WTC in 1993.

Subject: RE: folkies in Sussex
From: Teribus
Date: 29 Jan 03 - 06:49 AM

The Gribble at Oving - Excellent night

Murray, a question - Is "The Royal Oak" you refer to the one at Langstone Harbour? - terrific pub and also a good night, unfortunately only once a month I believe.

Subject: RE: BS: Mandela on Bush
From: GUEST
Date: 31 Jan 03 - 06:44 PM

Doug R-

I sense that you are old, and your knowledge of history does not speak well for your keeping abreast of new information on World War II that has come to light in the last fifty-eight years.

Sensible folks now agree that the dropping of those two bombs was an unnecessary abomination and a political ploy pushed on Truman by by the lunatic Edward Teller.

Subject: RE: BS: Mandela on Bush
From: GUEST
Date: 31 Jan 03 - 08:03 PM

I am sorry to disagree with some posters but my father was involved in the blockade and bombardment of Japan at the time the atomic bombs were dropped and it was a pretty common perception amongst amongst the ordinary servicemen involved that Japan was a matter of weeks away from surrendering.

Subject: RE: BS: Mandela on Bush
From: GUEST
Date: 01 Feb 03 - 12:01 AM

So Celtic Soul, just what alternatives are there to the UN? You say you aren't pro-Bush, just anti-politics. Well, that kind of naivety is much too dangerous for the suffering world to tolerate.

Subject: RE: BS: Mandela on Bush
From: GUEST
Date: 01 Feb 03 - 01:32 AM

I am so glad to see so many who understand the insanity of this pre-emptive war and Bush, who shoud be impeached. Ramsey Clark is leading the movement to impeach Bush, and I wonder if it may be the only way to stop him from starting this war that will never end. People are speaking out and speaking up, and for those of you on this list who think that we Americans are mostly sheep and cowards, I want you to know that many Americans are working very hard to try to stop this attack from happening.

Subject: RE: BS: Mandela on Bush
From: GUEST
Date: 01 Feb 03 - 10:11 AM

The entire world applauds the US anti-war movement, and is doing all it can to act in solidarity with it. We only wish that the citizenry of the US were like them.

Nonetheless, the anti-war movement doesn't change the fact that the majority of Americans are greedy, selfish cowards.

Subject: RE: BS: Mandela on Bush
From: GUEST
Date: 01 Feb 03 - 07:47 PM

GUEST: I normally don't reply to unidentified flamers, but I'll make an exception.

You are referring to revisionist history which was brought about by the promoters who came up with the phrase McGrath is so fond of ...political correctness. If you don't think thousands of Japanese civilians as well as thousands of allied service men would have died as a result of an allied invasion of Japan, you are just plain wrong.

Subject: RE: BS: Mandela on Bush
From: Teribus
Date: 03 Feb 03 - 05:36 AM

I am amazed at the number posting on this topic and to associated threads, who continually refer to America's arrogance with regard to the United Nations over the current Iraq crisis. Many of the same people also refer to America's "unilateralist" actions.

Why, some may ask am I amazed? - Simple


Subject: RE: BS: Mandela on Bush
From: GUEST
Date: 02 Feb 03 - 12:07 AM

DougR, old boy,

I know you mean it as a right-wing term of opprobrium, but that's your usual nonsense: ALL history, if well and professionally done is 'revisionist'- it is revised and updated on the basis of ongoing research, documents that are declassified, new facts that come to light.

Please don't while on about the right-wing shibboleth of 'political correctness' which you regularly apply indiscriminately to anything you don't agree with.