Brucie;

"Understand, that as far as I am concerned, the name of the game is global domination."

Is it? Somehow I don't think so because that as an objective is incredibly difficult, if not impossible, to attain.

Some say that at the height of the British Empire, global domination was the name of the game. It wasn't, the possibility was even less likely, with a population the size of Britains. The factor that drove British foreign policy for the past 400 years was that nobody could be allowed to establish hegemony in Europe, as long as that condition remained Britain was safe.

Could the same thing not apply today with the US and the world?