The history of the couple was not made available to the jury nor the public until after the trial as this would have prejudiced the case. I still assume you have only heard the verdict not the additional reports so far broadcast. I don't pretend to be right and like you thought she was a dupe but I feel that the picture is more complete now and we can draw other conclusions. I don't think that mine are outlandish they are a reasonable assessment of the facts available. A woman lives with a man who she twice gives alibis. One time it worked the other time it didn't. The man had a history of accusations of attacking or molesting young women and girls. Its not leaping to conclusions and it ain't rocket science. You're not a plod by any chance?