Amos says on the following thread.
Are we still having fun as fascists yet
The actual problem is when a corporation grows so large that it cannot communicate coherently and an individual can no longer feel he can communicate with the top. At that point, dehumanization occurs and all the ills of corporatism begin to set in.

Perhaps this process of "dehumanization" is not just brought on by growth? Perhaps this can also be brought on by an organisation or 'system' being founded on a mistaken or false premise and defended on this?

Joe Offer on the Shambles can you help?

It seems to me that oftentimes, the stongest advocates of anarchy are the ones who want to take over, enthroning themselves as petty tyrants. Funny thing - the strongest advocates of control have the same goals. And those of us in the middle often seem to lose out in this polarized world.

If people make criticism, suggestions and ask perfectly reasonable questions on our forum – are viewed as wishing to 'take over' and they are NOT anarchists who would wish to do this but are just 'in the middle' making criticism of both extremes– the whole premise on which the current censorship regime is operating is a false premise.

Then those that are being "dehumanized" by the 'system' are the ones 'in the middle'.