Hutton can report until he is blue in the face but anyone with half an ounce of gumption who has followed the "shennanigans" of the major players in this sad tale will know what to believe. I understand that Hutton says it is legitimate for the Cabinet to demand re-presentations of Intelligence reports for its` own end; in other words to present to Parliament reports that look more attractive. I venture to suggest this borders on dishonesty or "sexing up" and when there is clear evidence of government "gurus" (Campbell et al) pursuing a policy of "f-----g" a journalist rather than offering a case to negate his report, one wonders whatever next? I also understand his report says Dr.Kelly what not entitled to officailly advise Milligan yet there are records on film of that expert sitting on high level media briefings throughout the world on WMD.
What are they like?