The server seems to have crashed - it worked about a minute after I made the post. Let's try a link to the transcripts.

Broadly, Hoon is arguing that although he has seen the press had 'given a false impression of' the 45 minute claim, he decided against issuing a correction because the press wouldn't have printed it anyway. When challenged whether he had a responsibility to do this he said his department would not be 'solely responsible' for any correction. I would would have asked him what he did to discharge his part of that responsibility.