Frank,

If you insist on bringing up points in the earlier thread, so be it. I didn't mean for my comments there to appear acrimonious either, until you started making very harsh accusations of wrongdoing that were completely unfounded--nonsense about records being confiscated. This sounded pretty acrimonious to me, especially since it was false. I assumed you were lying, or at best purposely distorting the truth, but perhaps you were merely mistaken.

My "charges" that you hated Republicans were based also on your own statements, too complex to be brought up here (unless you want this thread to turn into that one). Suffice it to say that you suggested a judge could not be impartial if he was a Republican.

I also think it's funny that one of your main points was "Karl Rove SAYS he wants Dean to be the candidate, so it must be true!" But on the other hand, you don't think a Republican polling firm, which delivers opposition research to Republicans for their campaigns, can be trusted.