Well, gol danged... Saddam was a bad man. Shoot we should have attacked him a long time ago. Like when we were in middle of supplyong him with weapons of mass destruction. Then we would have had at least a clue when the danged things were...

Ahhhh, what ever happened to that pre-emption argrument anyway. I ain't heard that one gettin' even a spin around the block, let alone out of the garage, these days.... I thought that was the entire reason fir attacking Iraq??? Silly me... Now it's Saddam was a bad, bad man..

Well, what's the point... There are no shortage of bad, bad men ruling countries in the world. We gonna attack all their countries?

And while we're back on the subject of attacking folks, ahhh, is Saddam dead? No? Hmmmmm? How many Iraqis and Americans who were'nt bad, bad men, women and children are dead instead. Hmmmmmm?

Like, lots, that's how many...

No one has answered the question that I've asked until I'm blue in the face from askin'. If Saddam was the problem, why not just assasinate him, rather than kill a bunch of other non-Saddam other folks?

If anyone has an aswer to this question, I'd sure appreciate it. Heck, I'd probably accept "My dog ate my homework" as a start...

It scares me to live in a country (the US) that has so many folks who have lost all abilities to, ahhh, think on their own.... But that's another story (kind of...).

Bobert