I wasn't suggesting any such thing, Strick!! I am surprised at the interpretation that has been put on my words. I simply suggested that no law should be made regarding any establishment of religion -- that means injecting any support of a religious establishment into the law. People can have whatever reasons they choose for their preferences. Some use religion and some use reasons and sonmetimes the two are intersecting sets! Point is that religous matters have no place at law and never should have.

The President has opened himself to impeachment for a violation of his oath to defend the Consittution, by suggesting it should be modified on religous grounds.

A