Ya know, I must be naive AND opinionated, both. When the President of the United States originates the idea of a consittutional amendment and says he will support such a porposition, I kinda take him seriously. I can't get used to the notion that every phrase out of his mouth is a self-serving alteration of fact; and certainly not that this is normal operation. But now I am being told that i shouldn't be surprised -- he probably never meant such a thing, he just said it as a manipulation of public opinion. In other words the man is lying again. OK.

Now that I am beginning to get used to -- the notion that he is a fatfaced chronic continuous liar. The kind of guy you would expect to be sellling used Mercuries.

But when he as POTUS says that the amendment he is willing to consider and supprot is one that inserts moral strictures into the US COsntitution, as far as I am concerned, he is demonstrating a woeful ignorance as to the duties ofhis own position and discrediting his own heritage and undermining the COTUS. And therefore deserves to be roundly criticized and even fired.

As one of his 300 million employers, my small part of his employment consciousness is past the point of patience and says, "You're fired".

Anyone wanna join me? More than welcome.

A