The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #68352   Message #1153393
Posted By: GUEST,Clint Keller
03-Apr-04 - 03:33 AM
Thread Name: BS: Rice to testify publicly, under oath
Subject: RE: BS: Rice to testify publicly, under oath
Getting back to the subject, I read an editorial by David Broder today. It was in the paper, not the net, so I don't have a link.

He said Bush chickened out by agreeing to let C. Rice testify under oath, which annoyed me; isn't it time somebody was honest with us?

But when I read it all I saw I hadn't really thought it through.

Broder's right: if Bush was the hero he claims to be he'd have had Condoleeza keep her mouth shut -- especially shut to the talk shows, for godsake -- and taken the oath and the responsibility himself. That's what he's supposed to get his name in the history books for, taking the responsibility. Instead he'll feed Condoleeza to the wolves and evade responsibility while Cheney holds his hand. And feeds him the answers.

clint