Maybe it would not be such a problem getting wet weather insurance if the Arena area was not so affected by the weather. As I said before, it seems really obvious to me that there should be cover there.

If I was an insurance company being asked to underwrite the event, I would expect that they would not be seen to be tempting fate so much and making themselves so vulnerable to the weather.

Is it possible that the insurance would be cheaper if the risk was not so great? Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems to me like something worth considering.

Jenny