Martin, I am not sure about the point you are making - there are many other wrong books, but not being used by the DoD. And the book has indeed been proven wrong - it has even been used as a case study, if I am correct, for bias-driven sociology manuals by a university (name was posted on another thread).

So, what's your point - other than calling people old hippies (was that supposed to be derogatory, by the way? some people would be proud to be old hippies)?