You do seem to be able to work out who that post was from and it is not (yet) against the 'rules' is it?

Nor it seems is posting as a unknown, un-named 'guest' to defend your actions in deleting the posts of other contributors because it was 'cut and paste' and was considered not to have any original comment. Or that both these actions are defended because they considered the post in question to be a 'no brainer'.

There was never any real need to create any more threads, there is already two of these and also the following with the comments on the unknown guest who deletes the contributions of others (and I had earlier provided a link to this one). If indeed the post in question in this thread, did come from this person, as there is no way to tell?
Deleted post

Those who would deny our freedoms and attempt to justify this, will always try to hide behind the so-called 'rules' and find many solid sounding reasons for their actions. This why it is so important for us to always be consistent in supporting this freedom, even or especially when the views being expressed are not to our taste.   

Freedom is, and will always remain a pretty scary concept. There never will be a simple (or a tidy) answer.

Other that being prepared to accept that others should always be permitted to have the same freedoms that we accept as our right, no matter how strongly we may disagree with the views being expressed..............