geez, I'm going to fire my typist. Think tanks.

On a separate thread Beardedbruce has suggested that because I don't answer the arguments IN the article that started this thread instead of deconstructing the publication in which the article appears (thus revealing the bias of the article) that I'm evading his question. The point of deconstructing the mouthpiece--this online "journal"--was to render the article null. To argue the points of the article on the terms of the article is to accept the context as presented by the members of this ultra-conservative think tank.

"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain" says Bruce, "just look at the words in the form of this article." Sorry, but I won't do that.

SRS