Was this really a poet, she thought, or is it a political incursion by a particularly dastardly form of trolling - destroying the vibrant nature of the site by attempting to bore us all into slinking away. she noticed how many people had just walked away from particlar threads.


BeardedBruce, I'm not the one posting saccharin poetry by the yard. The writing is on the wall, but I'm not surprised you can't recognize yourself in this description because you're just too dense. You may speak English and string words together grammatically, but your reasoning is amazingly shallow and you have all of the charm of a festering boil when you decide to make a stand on any given thread.

. . .when my statements are challanged, not because there is any evidence to the contrary but because the supporting facts are not from the properly liberal source. . .

People have given ample and consistently solid supporting material to show why your arguments are nonsense. They've gone out of their way to explain clearly and in great detail what the problems are with the argument you're presenting. Their sources are mainstream and reliable (do you equate "reliable" with "liberal?"). Yet you bluster along and continue the argument by ignoring the facts and stating and restating your opinion. If someone doesn't repeat and respond to every point you try to make, you come up with the obnoxious and self-serving rejoinder along the lines of "since you didn't respond to this point I will presume that you think I'm right."

You presume way too much, fella, and you test the patience of a lot of good people who have been polite to you far longer than you deserve.