The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #71319   Message #1221618
Posted By: Bobert
08-Jul-04 - 03:52 PM
Thread Name: BS: New thread on WMD
Subject: RE: BS: New thread on WMD
Don:

Teribus is on the Bush payroll... If not, he ougtta be... Of all the Bush apologists I have ever read or heard, he is as died-in-the-wool true believer as any...

T-Bird:

You keep wanting to dismiss one major arguemnt that has been made several times about the empty cannisters and traces of possibly sarin.

Now I know yer down in Oz or somewhere other than the US so maybe you are missing the *fact*, yes fact, that yer guy Bush is struggling here in the US with major crdibility issues and could certainly use a breakthru, and fast... Now if he had credible evidence of WMD, why aren't his people coming forward with it?

Heck, they still got Dick Cheney running all over the country giving his patent speech about how Saddam was linked to 9/11. No, you can say that isn't exactly what he's saying but if you took 100 aliens who just dropped in from space and let them listen to one of these speeches, 100 aliens would have the impression that Saddam was in cohooyts with bin Laden on the 9// attacks. I mean, do you get the speeches down there, T? Well, we sho nuff do and a lot of folks in the US think that Saddam was in on 9/11 because of these carefully crafted PR speeches.

But my point is, T-zer, and this doesn't involve a lot of reseacr on yer part or even another "War and Peace" lenght rebuttal, but just a little common sense. Wouldn't you think that an administration so hard up to be right on any of the Big Three would jump all over WMD if they had some danged evidence and give poor ol'Cheney's song and dance routine a breather?

Hey, this is a pure and simple logic question. You don't even have to do no new-math to figgure this one out...

But like Bush, we know that you never admit that you might be incorrect on an issue for fear that if you do the "House of Cards" will come down...

But, hark, pal... I gotta respect yer loyalty.

Bobert