Reading the links posted here I get angry for at least two reasons:

(1) the attack added deadly injury to the insult of last Friday's ruling at The Hague that the fence is illegal and must be dismantled. (from the article of the last link).

A journalist aiming at accuracy would have told that the The Hague ruling did not declare the fence illegal, but only where it is positioned. That's a big difference and it could be explained to the readers.

(2) I wonder about Masrawa. He could know it all along that the Palestinian bombing campaign was indiscriminate and that it killed Jews, Arabs, foreign visitors, whoever was near to the explosion. Masrawa is far from being the first Arab victim of Palestinian bombs (not counting the suicide carriers). Why someone has to feel injury himself before objecting to indiscriminate bombing I can not understand.

Wolfgang