Well I've seen plenty that's "unexplainable" using today's scientific methods and technology. (daylia)

Do I see hubris here? Daylia, I may do you wrong, but your contributions didn't give me the impression you have a deep knowledge of science. So if you see something for which you do not find a natural explanation how do you come to the conclusion that there is no scientific explanation instead of saying that you know of none? And even if you know that there is no scientific explanation yet what makes you state that what you have seen is 'unexplainable' (instead of merely 'yet unexplained')?

Every man has a right to utter what he thinks truth, and every other man has a right to knock him down for it. (Samuel Johnson) (Who is this Johnson guy?)

Wolfgang