Read again Villan, and engage brain before opening mouth! :0) I was querying the fact that, by late morning on Saturday, no-one had started the usual review thread. I said 'Was it THAT bad? John O'Hagan was good at least'. I.e. 'No, it wasn't THAT bad, at least (i.e. a minimum of -) one performer was good'. It was a general observation, not a critique of one artist's performance.

For the record, John O'Hagan was excellent - precisely as one would expect from a professional of many years' standing.

SJ :0)